How horrid! My husband and I have a chihuahua. He barks. Sometimes he barks a lot. The thing is though that he is a dog and dogs bark. He barks when strangers come over and he barks when he hears a strange noise outside and he barks when he’s excited but he’s a dog and while yes, it gets annoying at times, it’s also an essential component of who he is.
From the online petition posted on Change.org:
“Massachusetts currently has the only enforceable state devocalization ban in the US. Other state laws protect owners and vets but not animals, who are subjected to a dangerous surgery they don’t need but are helpless to refuse.
We wish veterinary associations had supported legislation that truly protects animals by prohibiting vocal cord surgery except to treat a physical illness, injury or birth defect.”
“Though an experienced vet devocalized our gentle giant, Porter, in the leastinvasive way, scar tissue formed in his throat, making it hard for him to breathe and swallow; he rasps, coughs and gags throughout the day like a chain smoker. Because devocalization permanently damaged his larynx too, he’s at great risk for inhaling food, liquids, even vomit into his lungs.
Tiny Lola struggles to force out a bark and doesn’t always succeed. Like other devocalized animals, she coughs and gags a lot. One day, she may have to face the same $2,000 surgery Porter needed to save his life after he was devocalized.
That’s brutal punishment for the “crime” of communicating!
Please don’t let this brutality continue. Tell the AVMA: There is no ethical reason to cut vocal cords just to stifle an animal’s voice—ever. Devocalization is an act of cruelty that no animal deserves, no vet should perform, no veterinary association should sanction, and no civilized society should allow.
- Urge the American Veterinary Medical Association to Stop Condoning Animal Devocalization (forcechange.com)
- Dog debarking policy at AVMA raises activists’ howls of protest (vitals.nbcnews.com)